Erdős·erdos:625
Erdős 625
No independent check recorded yet. A formal artifact, declaration or published object is attached, but no rebuild of it is recorded here.
A Palomar registration names this problem. It is shown below but not counted as a check of the claim.
Fidelity F2: The correspondence is declared through an alignment table and written divergences.
graph theory, chromatic number·Source
AI activity
How grades workNo AI contribution recorded against this statement.
Does the formal statement say what was claimed?
F2 declared The correspondence is declared through an alignment table and written divergences.
Computed from what the project declares and what the register holds, never from reading the mathematics. How fidelity is graded.
Checks
1-
verified Palomar
Registered by Palomar at 9702b5e7: Comparator confirmed 2 theorems prove the recorded statement within Palomar's axiom policy, replayed through Lean's kernel and the independent nanoda kernel. The project names this problem, which does not establish that it proves the result claimed here, so it is not counted as a check of it
Declared by the projects
1Read from each project's formalization.yaml. A declaration is what the authors say about their own work, recorded so that a check can confirm or contradict it.
Erdős Problem 625: chromatic versus cochromatic number of a random graph
- method
- agent — OpenAI GPT-5 family
- review
- self-assessed — self-assessed with independent kernel replay; not peer-reviewed
- axioms
- Classical.choice, Quot.sound, propext
- sorry
- 0 unproved goals declared
- sources
- Erdős Problem 625: manuscript and Lean formalization — other, authors participated; Some Problems and Results in Cochromatic Theory — background, authors n/a; The Difference Between the Chromatic and the Cochromatic Number of a Random Graph — background, authors not-contacted
- divergences
- The formal theorem matches the manuscript's uniform quantitative result. It omits only the stronger nonconstant phase-resolved refinement, as stated explicitly in the scope field.
- checked by
- Palomar
Follow and discuss
All discussionGet an email when this problem moves
A new claim, a check, a bounty or a discussion. One link to confirm, one click to stop.
Discussion and bounties for this problem load here.
Formal material
Formal statements · 0
No formal statement located.
Cited proofs · 0
No proof artifact cited by the formal record.
Also known as · 1
- https://www.erdosproblems.com/625