656 theorems on the standard axioms only
Formal record
The formal record
What 567 Lean projects declare about their own proofs, set against what an independent check has actually established.
Browse declarations
No results match. Try a broader search or reset the filters.
Check history
52 checksEvery check attached to a result: rebuilt here, registered by Palomar, or tested by the object checker.
346 theorems on the standard axioms only
172 theorems on the standard axioms only
96 theorems on the standard axioms only
96 theorems on the standard axioms only
68 theorems on the standard axioms only
65 theorems on the standard axioms only
51 theorems on the standard axioms only
49 theorems on the standard axioms only
46 theorems on the standard axioms only
39 theorems on the standard axioms only
32 theorems on the standard axioms only
25 theorems on the standard axioms only
23 theorems on the standard axioms only, at cec57f91
17 theorems on the standard axioms only
11 theorems on the standard axioms only
7 theorems on the standard axioms only
4 theorems on the standard axioms only
4 theorems on the standard axioms only
3 theorems on the standard axioms only
2x2x2 in 7 multiplications, exact identity mod 2
4x4x4 in 47 multiplications, exact identity mod 2
512 points in dimension 8, no three collinear
Registered by Palomar at d61132ff: Comparator confirmed 17 theorems prove the recorded statement within Palomar's axiom policy, replayed through Lean's kernel and the independent nanoda kernel
Registered by Palomar at 46544fab: Comparator confirmed 12 theorems prove the recorded statement within Palomar's axiom policy, replayed through Lean's kernel and the independent nanoda kernel
Registered by Palomar at 218d1c1e: Comparator confirmed 7 theorems prove the recorded statement within Palomar's axiom policy, replayed through Lean's kernel and the independent nanoda kernel. The project names this problem, which does not establish that it proves the result claimed here, so it is not counted as a check of it
Registered by Palomar at 4543ff77: Comparator confirmed 5 theorems prove the recorded statement within Palomar's axiom policy, replayed through Lean's kernel and the independent nanoda kernel. The project names this problem, which does not establish that it proves the result claimed here, so it is not counted as a check of it
Registered by Palomar at be43a3ea: Comparator confirmed 4 theorems prove the recorded statement within Palomar's axiom policy, replayed through Lean's kernel and the independent nanoda kernel. The project names this problem, which does not establish that it proves the result claimed here, so it is not counted as a check of it
Registered by Palomar at aa0cd43f: Comparator confirmed 2 theorems prove the recorded statement within Palomar's axiom policy, replayed through Lean's kernel and the independent nanoda kernel. The project names this problem, which does not establish that it proves the result claimed here, so it is not counted as a check of it
Registered by Palomar at 9702b5e7: Comparator confirmed 2 theorems prove the recorded statement within Palomar's axiom policy, replayed through Lean's kernel and the independent nanoda kernel. The project names this problem, which does not establish that it proves the result claimed here, so it is not counted as a check of it
Registered by Palomar at 1571a487: Comparator confirmed 2 theorems prove the recorded statement within Palomar's axiom policy, replayed through Lean's kernel and the independent nanoda kernel
Registered by Palomar at 1ddea92d: Comparator confirmed 2 theorems prove the recorded statement within Palomar's axiom policy, replayed through Lean's kernel and the independent nanoda kernel
Registered by Palomar at 776a5817: Comparator confirmed 1 theorems prove the recorded statement within Palomar's axiom policy, replayed through Lean's kernel and the independent nanoda kernel. The project names this problem, which does not establish that it proves the result claimed here, so it is not counted as a check of it
Registered by Palomar at 54f27258: Comparator confirmed 1 theorems prove the recorded statement within Palomar's axiom policy, replayed through Lean's kernel and the independent nanoda kernel
Registered by Palomar at 43f89415: Comparator confirmed 1 theorems prove the recorded statement within Palomar's axiom policy, replayed through Lean's kernel and the independent nanoda kernel
Registered by Palomar at 85032a43: Comparator confirmed 1 theorems prove the recorded statement within Palomar's axiom policy, replayed through Lean's kernel and the independent nanoda kernel
Lean.ofReduceBool, Lean.trustCompiler
error: ComparatorChallenges: package directory not found: /tmp/qed-checks/plby-lean-proofs-68da20b9-src_latest/ComparatorChallenges
imports project modules: FormalConjectures.Util.ProblemImports
imports project modules: FormalConjectures.Util.ProblemImports
imports project modules: FormalConjectures.Util.ProblemImports
imports project modules: UnitFractions.Definitions, UnitFractions.FinalResults
imports project modules: FormalConjectures.Util.ProblemImports
imports project modules: FormalConjectures.Util.ProblemImports
imports project modules: UnitFractions.ErdosProblems
imports project modules: Erdos539.Main
imports project modules: FormalConjectures.Util.ProblemImports
imports project modules: Erdos
imports project modules: ErdosProblems.Erdos368b
imports project modules: RequestProject.Sharpness, RequestProject.UpperBound
imports project modules: FormalConjectures.Util.ProblemImports
imports project modules: FormalConjectures.Util.ProblemImports
Overview
About the index
A Lean project can publish a formalization.yaml declaring what it proves, which axioms its results rest on, what it assumes from the literature, how the work was produced and who reviewed it. This register reads every one it can find, across 348 repositories.
A declaration is not evidence. A check is: this register rebuilds proofs and objects itself, and cites Palomar, which rebuilds a project at a pinned commit, confirms with Comparator that the proof proves the recorded statement, and replays it through two independent kernels. Where a declaration and a check disagree, the disagreement is the finding.
Copies kept under review, verification and history directories are set aside before anything is read, and only the newest version of a versioned result is kept: 142 snapshot copies and 11 superseded versions this build. 38 declarations join a statement or record held here.
What a verdict means
- verified
- Elaborated, and every theorem rests on the standard axioms alone — or, for Palomar, registered after Comparator and two kernels accepted it.
- axioms
- Elaborated, but something further is assumed — typically the
native_decidepair, which trusts the compiler rather than the kernel. - incomplete
- A theorem depends on
sorryAx, so an unproved goal survived into the final term. - fragment
- The file imports its own project's modules, so it is a statement or a fragment rather than a standalone proof.
- no deps
- The project's dependencies could not be resolved at the pinned commit.
- invalid
- An object failed the constraints of its own problem.
- refuted
- An object is sound but does not reach the value claimed for it.
Fidelity grades
- F3
- Anchored. The proof is checked for exact statement identity against a statement written independently of it, held here from a separate statement corpus.
- F2
- Declared. The authors record how the formal statement corresponds to the claim — a comparator challenge, an alignment table or written divergences — or a statement corpus cites the proof against its own statement.
- F1
- Unaudited. A formal artifact exists, but nothing records that its statement says what the claim says.
- F0
- None. No formal statement is attached to the result.